REPUTATION FROG — DOCTORS' OFFICES REVIEW WORKSHEET
For organizing a review concern, not a Google submission form.

Business name:
Correct public profile URL:
Individual review URL:
Case owner:
Date captured:

INTERACTION
What interaction does the review describe?
Which facts are documented?
What remains uncertain?
What alternative explanations have been checked?

INDUSTRY EVIDENCE CHECKLIST
[ ] Correct office name, public address and Business Profile URL.
[ ] Full review screenshot and the specific passage of concern.
[ ] Public specialty or location information relevant to a claimed mismatch.
[ ] A minimal operational summary and prior report decision; keep clinical records in their proper systems.

TEAM HANDOFF
[ ] Assign review handling to an authorized practice representative.
[ ] Separate public-facing wording from any private investigation.
[ ] Review sensitive drafts under the practice's own privacy procedures before posting.

INDUSTRY INVESTIGATION PROMPTS
Distinguish office interactions from a clinical-record search
[ ] Identify the operational issue rather than assuming a care dispute.
[ ] Choose an authorized owner for any private investigation.
[ ] Record the limits of the name or interaction search.

Check practitioner, location and office-name confusion


Make the public response and private follow-through separate tasks


EVIDENCE INDEX
File name / relevant date / fact supported / limitation:

HISTORY
Previous report date and decision:
Approved response version:
Action actually completed:
Next internal follow-up and owner:

Keep originals privately. Do not include passwords, payment details or unrelated sensitive information.

Full guide: https://www.reputationfrog.com/industries/doctors-offices
General worksheet: https://www.reputationfrog.com/resources/review-case-checklist.txt
Service scope: https://www.reputationfrog.com/google-review-removal
Billing terms: https://www.reputationfrog.com/billing-policy